Media buying operations

Performance Marketing Network: Check the Terms Before Buying Traffic

Compare a performance marketing network by the relationship you are entering: eligible offers, permitted traffic, accepted conversions and the money that becomes payable. We help affiliates and media buyers inspect those terms, then use FroggyAds for the self-serve paid-traffic part of a permitted campaign. Keep the offer agreement and media purchase clear before committing spend.

Primary objectiveVerify the offer terms and paid-traffic route
Decision metricAccepted value, cost scope and settlement status
Reporting splitOffer, route, action cohort and validation period
Quality evidenceApproval, reversal and payment explanations
Performance Marketing Network: Evaluation Framework campaign system

What should you verify before choosing a performance marketing network?

Quick answer: Identify who supplies the offer, who sells the traffic and who decides whether a conversion earns payment. Verify the exact promotion method, tracking route, approval and reversal rules, reporting detail and settlement terms. Choose FroggyAds when you want direct self-serve media controls for an eligible campaign, and keep any external affiliate-network agreement separate from your media-buying account.

SectionPractical decision on this page
Relationship and responsibilitiesIdentify the offer provider, media seller, conversion validator and payment obligation.
Traffic eligibilityConfirm that the exact offer permits the planned format, market, destination and promotion method.
Accepted value and settlementDistinguish recorded conversions, approved commissions, later reversals and cash actually received.

For auction context, consult IAB Tech Lab OpenRTB.

Decision framework

What does a performance marketing network relationship include?

Networks can perform different jobs. An affiliate network connects advertisers and publishers under offer and commission terms. An ad network supplies advertising inventory through its own buying conditions. A media buyer may use both in the same campaign: buy eligible traffic, send visitors to an approved offer and later reconcile accepted commissions. The label performance marketing network alone does not tell you which obligation you are taking on. Ask the provider to describe the actual relationship before comparing a payout or rate.

Commercial readiness starts with the event that creates value or payment. For an affiliate offer, determine which lead, sale or other action is eligible and who validates it. For the media purchase, confirm the actual billable unit and account terms. An affiliate commission does not turn the traffic purchase into a pay-per-conversion arrangement. Keep those contracts distinguishable so an accepted-customer target cannot be mistaken for a FroggyAds billing model.

Advertised payouts are incomplete without their conditions. Review allowed markets, customer eligibility, promotional restrictions, validation timing and reasons an event may be reversed. Ask how exceptions and disputes are handled and retain the applicable terms. A larger headline commission may leave less usable margin when fewer outcomes qualify or payment remains unresolved. Compare the evidence available for your intended traffic route rather than selecting a relationship from the most attractive advertised number.

Operating controls

Connect six campaign controls with the network agreement

Six controls make the relationship practical. Each should answer an operating question rather than merely add another dashboard metric. Keep the relevant offer terms beside the campaign settings, and inspect the reporting detail your actual systems supply. That gives an affiliate or advertiser a concrete basis for deciding whether a test is ready.

01

Objective and accepted event

Objective should name the outcome the offer actually accepts. A submitted enquiry and an eligible, validated lead may be different events. Retain the definition, exclusions and version that applied when the visitor arrived. If the advertiser changes qualification requirements, record the effective point and affected cohort instead of silently comparing the new result with the old one.

02

Inventory and traffic permission

Inventory must fit the offer permission as well as the creative. Confirm whether the proposed source type, format, market and receiving route are allowed. A network listing an offer does not establish that every promotion method is permitted. Keep written clarification where the terms are ambiguous. Do not launch an unsupported route in the hope that a later conversion will make it acceptable.

03

Bids and affordable media expense

Bidding should follow the amount your business can risk and the value supported by mature acceptance evidence. Record the media expense separately from commissions and other operating costs. Where approval behaviour is unknown, treat the first purchase as a bounded test rather than applying an optimistic payout to every recorded event. Confirm the current campaign controls and how you will review the remaining commitment.

04

Creative and offer continuity

Creative needs approval for the actual claims and destination where the offer requires it. Preserve the version that was used and the promise the visitor saw. A message that attracts more clicks by concealing eligibility can weaken acceptance later. We recommend making the next step understandable so the campaign tests relevant demand rather than the appeal of an incomplete description.

05

Source decisions and restrictions

Source decisions should use the finest reporting scope that can be verified. Keep campaign and source identifiers where your actual reports provide them, and connect accepted outcomes only when the joins support that detail. A source-level delivery report does not automatically establish source-level commission quality. Record known limitations before deciding whether to retain, restrict or investigate a segment.

06

Reallocation after acceptance

Reallocation should follow a dated review of the relevant cohort. Separate recent recorded events from those that have completed the applicable acceptance or reversal window. Explain whether the next purchase expands the same route or tests a different offer condition. That distinction matters because a successful result under one agreement may not transfer to a newly restricted market or destination.

Verify the buying route

How does FroggyAds fit a permitted network campaign?

Our self-serve controls let you choose the supported format, targeting, bids and budget for the paid-media test. Keep the external offer identifier and approved receiving route in your own campaign record. Confirm the current settings and reporting before relying on a particular dimension. Use the media account to manage traffic execution, and retain the external agreement for offer access, commissions and settlement.

Create My Free Account
Illustration of audience targeting controls for a performance marketing network test
Implementation workflow

How do you test a network relationship before increasing spend?

Follow seven steps to make the first purchase reviewable. The aim is to verify the relationship and its economics under a specific set of conditions. A small test cannot prove that every offer or source in a network will behave the same way. Keep the conclusion as narrow as the evidence.

01

Write the offer and payment brief

Write down the advertiser or offer provider, accepted event, applicable terms and payment recipient. Identify who can answer an eligibility or validation question. Add the proposed media route and the largest pilot expense you can absorb. Resolve the essential ambiguities before launch so a later rejection does not reveal that the team tested a different agreement from the one it intended.

02

Map the permitted promotion route

Map the path from advertisement through the approved destination to the qualifying action. Check allowed source types, markets and any restrictions on intermediate pages. Keep the actual approval or clarification with the brief. If a redirect or receiving page changes, inspect the route again before buying more traffic; a working URL alone does not prove the promotion remains eligible.

03

Set the media and cash boundaries

Set an affordable media commitment and a review point for pending outcomes. Distinguish funds deposited, media consumed and commissions expected or received where those categories apply. A payout delay can affect how much another campaign can responsibly commit even when approved value looks positive. Avoid using expected cash twice by treating unsettled commissions as already available for reinvestment.

04

Launch the approved creative and destination

Launch the agreed route with identifiable creative and destination versions. Test the records your setup should produce before interpreting commercial performance. Monitor operational faults while preserving the agreed question. A necessary repair may change the visitor experience; note its timing so the later acceptance review can distinguish the affected cohort from the earlier conditions.

05

Review conversion status at the right age

Review recorded, pending, approved and reversed outcomes separately where those statuses are available. Confirm whether the report date describes the visitor action, validation or settlement. Give each cohort the time required by its actual terms. An unexplained decline in acceptance needs investigation before a larger purchase, even when the early conversion report appears strong.

06

Reallocate with an explained commercial reason

Reallocate after deciding which issue the evidence supports. A prohibited market needs a different response from a reporting delay, duplicate event or weak but valid offer match. Retain the reason and scope of the action. Keep unresolved records visible so a cleaner-looking report cannot erase the uncertainty that affected the previous buying decision.

07

Document what the next test will change

Document the next question, approved commitment and conditions that remain comparable. State whether you are changing a message, source restriction, offer or market. Preserve useful earlier settings and terms so another authorised buyer can understand the change. Repeat the commercial checks when a material condition changes instead of assuming that the first permission covers every future campaign.

Performance Marketing Network: Evaluation Framework implementation workflow
Measurement design

How do you reconcile recorded, approved and paid outcomes?

Approved value should have a defined currency, cost scope and status date. A recorded conversion may still be pending validation, and an approved amount may still be unsettled. Retain any later reversals and fees that apply under the agreement. Use a clearly labelled net figure for the review, while keeping the underlying counts and amounts available for inspection.

Reporting should preserve the offer, campaign, market and action period at the level your systems support. Keep the validation and payment periods distinguishable from the acquisition date. A current payout report can contain older activity, so comparing it directly with today's media expense may create a misleading margin. Align the relevant cohort and cost records before choosing the next allocation.

Reconciliation should explain how the media report, tracking record and external network report relate. Identify missing identifiers, duplicate events, different attribution rules, delayed statuses and unresolved disputes. A match may be valid at campaign level even when finer source detail is unavailable. Use that verified scope openly; avoid assigning the same approved total to several segments merely to make the report appear complete.

LayerEvidenceGuardrailDecision
DeliveryMedia expense and available delivery recordsVerified report scope and traffic permissionRepair a delivery or eligibility problem
EngagementWorking route to the approved offer experienceConsistent promise and destination versionCorrect the receiving path where needed
ConversionRecorded, pending and validated actionsAcceptance definition and cohort ageInvestigate rejection or unexplained status gaps
ValueApproved value, reversals, applicable fees and received cashConsistent cost scope and settlement statusApprove another affordable commitment or pause

Select an eligible format

Choose a media format the offer actually permits

Available FroggyAds formats include Push, Native, Display, Pop, Video and Interstitial. Select the format that fits the approved promotion method, creative assets and receiving journey. Confirm the current campaign requirements before launch. A format being available in our platform does not by itself establish that an external affiliate offer accepts it; verify both sides of the route.

Create My Free Account
Illustration comparing advertising formats for performance marketing network execution
Campaign architecture

Separate delivery from conversion acceptance

A resilient campaign separates traffic eligibility, auction delivery, click handling, receiving-page behaviour, conversion reporting and final acceptance. Each stage can fail independently. A click can be billable while a later action fails the offer's qualification rule. Map those stages so an external rejection is investigated in its own context rather than treated as proof that every earlier media event was invalid.

Cells should represent a buying question the team can act on, such as one offer in one eligible market with a specific creative promise. Keep the applicable terms and receiving version beside the campaign reference. Avoid splitting reports into so many tiny groups that no acceptance comparison is interpretable. The purpose is to distinguish decisions, not to produce the longest possible list of segments.

Discovery and routine buying need different expectations. A new route may consume a bounded amount while its eligibility and response are checked. A repeat purchase relies on a more mature record. Keep that distinction visible in the expense review so accepted value from an established campaign cannot conceal the cost of several unresolved experiments.

Performance Marketing Network: Evaluation Framework decision matrix
Creative and landing experience

Keep the approved user journey consistent

Consistency connects the ad promise with the offer that can actually qualify. Review the customer-facing path as well as the reporting setup. A visitor should understand the action and material conditions before completing it. This gives both the media buyer and offer provider a clearer basis for assessing whether the resulting action fits the agreement.

01

Promise

Promise a benefit the advertiser can substantiate under the current offer. Keep the approved wording and material conditions available to the buyer. An attractive claim that the destination cannot fulfil can create poor acceptance and trust problems later, even if it increases initial response.

02

Continuity

Continuity means the advertisement, intermediate page where allowed and final destination describe the same proposition. Inspect the complete route after a meaningful change. Record which version affected each cohort so an acceptance dispute can be discussed with the actual customer experience in view.

03

Receiving experience

Receiving pages need a functional check on the relevant devices. A broken form or inaccessible step can prevent eligible visitors from completing the action. Verify the route before assigning commercial meaning to a low conversion count, and mark the affected period if a fault was present during delivery.

04

Qualification

Qualification should be understandable before the visitor acts. Clarify the offer's market, customer and action requirements without hiding material restrictions. Preserve the external acceptance definition in the campaign record. A smoother form cannot make an ineligible customer payable under a different set of terms.

05

Proof

Proof should consist of real product information, transparent conditions and relevant evidence. Retain the approval for claims where the offer requires it. Avoid fabricated reviews, unsupported earnings statements and artificial urgency. A media test is more useful when its response comes from a proposition the advertiser can actually deliver.

06

Identifiers

Identifiers need testing through the actual route. Inspect which campaign and click references survive redirects and which appear in conversion reports. Retain the observed limitation if a field is unavailable. A report should not imply source-level accepted value when only a broader campaign relationship can be verified.

Decision scenarios

How should you respond when network reports disagree?

Disagreement calls for a scoped investigation. Identify whether the mismatch concerns delivery, customer actions, validation, reversal or payment. Keep the original reports and dates so the relevant provider can inspect the same evidence. Changing the whole campaign before locating the issue can make the discrepancy harder to explain.

01

Approved value rises while settlement remains pending

Aggregate approved value can support a commercial review without being cash already received. Check the applicable settlement terms, unresolved adjustments and the period covered. Decide whether the business can afford another media commitment while the balance remains pending. A profitable-looking report should not conceal a cash constraint or an unanswered payment question.

02

A source restriction leaves little eligible delivery

Restrictions can reduce available volume without proving the remaining sources are poor. Recheck the actual offer permissions and inspect whether an earlier exclusion still applies. Any new discovery purchase should stay within approved methods and a defined commitment. Do not relax a commercial restriction merely because the campaign needs more volume.

03

A new route adds recorded conversions

Additional recorded conversions need their own acceptance review. Identify the new route and compare equally mature cohorts before treating it as an improvement. A new format may reach a different audience or change the receiving experience. A before-and-after report can show an observed difference; it does not establish incremental causation by itself.

Plan the next bounded action

Turn the discrepancy into one reviewable test

Choose the action that addresses the identified issue: repair a receiving fault, clarify an acceptance rule or test an eligible alternative source. Use FroggyAds to operate the paid-media part with the supported controls. Keep the external offer terms and pending outcomes visible so the next purchase has a clear purpose and affordable boundary.

Create My Free Account
Illustration of a campaign launch checklist for performance marketing network
Failure prevention

Eight mistakes to avoid when testing a network relationship

Eight mistakes can make an apparently active campaign commercially unclear. Use the list to identify a specific correction and owner. The remedy should follow the actual evidence rather than a general instruction to optimise more aggressively.

  1. 01Optimizing from pending conversions can overstate value. Wait for the applicable validation status before treating the amount as approved.
  2. 02Simultaneous bid, creative and destination changes obscure the comparison. Preserve the conditions or describe the combined intervention.
  3. 03Blending offers or periods can hide different permissions and approval rules. Keep the relevant agreement and cohort visible.
  4. 04Rewarding delivery alone can favour a route that produces few eligible outcomes. Check acceptance separately from media activity.
  5. 05Unreconciled identifiers can make a precise-looking margin unusable. Investigate missing joins before extending the commitment.
  6. 06Dependence on one offer or source leaves the plan exposed to changed terms. Define a permitted alternative test and its limit.
  7. 07Ignoring offer restrictions or material disclosures can invalidate the intended route. Resolve the applicable requirement before launch.
  8. 08Subsidising unresolved tests with older approved value hides the cost of discovery. Review each commitment within its own purpose.
Evidence milestones

Use evidence milestones for network evaluation

Milestones should follow the actual permission, tracking, validation and settlement dependencies. A fixed 30-day calendar cannot make a longer approval window complete sooner. Schedule operational checks during the test and a commercial review when the relevant records are ready, while retaining the commitment limit throughout.

01

Before purchase: confirm the relationship

Before purchase, retain the applicable offer terms, traffic permission and media settings. Verify the receiving route and test the identifiers your setup requires. Name the contact responsible for validation questions and the person who can approve more spend. Resolve a material eligibility ambiguity before traffic is bought.

02

During delivery: check operation and versions

During delivery, monitor the campaign and receiving experience for faults you can act on. Record creative, destination or offer changes and the time they took effect. Keep recent conversion statuses provisional where validation remains open. Use the agreed commitment boundary rather than a promising early event count to control the next expense.

03

After validation: reconcile accepted value

After validation, connect the relevant media expense with accepted outcomes, applicable reversals and fees. Investigate the largest unresolved gaps at the scope supported by the records. Keep pending settlement distinguishable from received cash. The review should state what is known, what remains open and whether the current result supports a further commitment.

04

At the next commitment: recheck changed conditions

At the next commitment, confirm that the offer, promotion route and acceptance rule still apply. State the proposed change and review condition. Preserve earlier useful settings and terms so the team can revisit an assumption. A materially different market, offer or destination needs its own approval and evidence rather than inheriting confidence from the earlier pilot.

Primary references

Standards and implementation references

Consult these references for the particular systems and concepts they document. Auction standards, attribution guidance and campaign experiments address different parts of the work. They do not establish that every external network or FroggyAds campaign has identical controls. Verify the actual implementation and agreement before relying on a specific reporting field or payment conclusion.

Frequently asked questions

Performance marketing network: ten practical questions

Answers focus on the relationship an affiliate, advertiser or media buyer must verify before committing traffic. Keep the external offer agreement and the media purchase distinguishable, then choose the evidence that supports your actual role.

What is a performance marketing network?

Terminology varies by provider. An affiliate network can connect advertisers and publishers under commission terms, while an ad network supplies advertising inventory under its buying conditions. Identify the actual service, billable event and payment responsibility. FroggyAds supports the self-serve paid-media side of a campaign; external offer access and commissions require their own agreement.

Can any traffic source be used for a network offer?

Permission depends on the exact offer and promotion method. Check the allowed format, source type, market, destination and any required approvals before launch. The availability of a format in a media-buying platform does not establish external offer eligibility. Resolve ambiguous terms with the responsible provider and retain the clarification.

How should I compare advertised network payouts?

Evaluate the payout alongside the accepted event, eligibility requirements, validation timing, reversal conditions, fees and settlement terms. Keep the underlying counts and cost scope visible. A higher headline amount is not evidence of greater usable margin when fewer actions qualify or payment remains unresolved.

Why can recorded conversions differ from approved conversions?

Validation may apply eligibility, duplication, attribution or other acceptance rules specified by the offer. Reporting delay can also leave recent events pending. Compare the same cohort and inspect the available reason codes or explanations. Avoid assuming that every recorded event is payable or that every gap proves a delivery failure.

Which media format should I choose for an affiliate offer?

Match the format to the offer permission, creative and receiving experience. We provide supported Push, Native, Display, Pop, Video and Interstitial buying options. Confirm current campaign requirements and the external agreement before selecting a route. Start with the format your team can operate and evaluate clearly.

What costs belong in a network campaign review?

Costs can include consumed media and other expenses relevant to your own test. Keep these separate from advertised commissions, approved value and received cash. Use a consistent cost basis and currency when comparing results. Confirm actual provider charges and terms; a hypothetical acquisition-cost calculation is not a quoted campaign price.

What records should I retain for reporting disputes?

Retain the applicable offer terms, traffic approval, creative and destination versions, dates and the identifiers your setup actually provides. Preserve the original media, tracking and network reports with the questioned cohort. State any missing joins openly so the provider can investigate a precise discrepancy rather than an unsupported aggregate accusation.

When should I pause a network campaign?

Pause when an essential permission is unresolved, the receiving route fails, tracking cannot support the planned comparison or the approved spending boundary is reached. Investigate material acceptance or payment discrepancies before extending the commitment. Define the repair evidence and responsible owner so a later restart has a clear basis.

How can I improve a network test without losing the comparison?

Improve the condition linked to the identified problem and record the material change. Preserve the relevant baseline and offer version where useful. Compare cohorts with compatible definitions and review ages. Several simultaneous changes may be necessary, but describe the combined intervention honestly rather than assigning the whole difference to one setting.

When is another media commitment justified?

Scale the next commitment when the relevant cohort has matured, accepted value and cost scope reconcile, permissions remain valid and the business can afford the step. Keep pending payment and unresolved limitations visible. Treat a new offer or promotion route as a changed condition requiring its own review.

Related playbooks

Choose the next paid-traffic resource

Related resources address different parts of execution. Push Ads Whitelist and Popunder Whitelist support source-selection work for those formats; Performance Marketing covers the wider operating model. Media Buying Course structures broader self-study. Keep this page focused on network permissions, acceptance, reversals and the commercial basis for the next purchase.

Launch with evidence

Start with a permitted offer and a reviewable media commitment

Start the paid-media part with FroggyAds when you want direct self-serve campaign control. Bring a clear offer agreement, credible creative and a working receiving route. Keep the acceptance and settlement questions visible while you test, then approve another purchase only from evidence that supports your role and intended campaign.

What transparency should the network demonstrate?

Direct answer

Transparency should be observable in the records you will use. Ask to inspect the applicable offer terms, a suitable reporting sample, conversion statuses and the route for raising a discrepancy. Confirm the detail available for your own intended channel. A general promise of transparency is incomplete if the team cannot demonstrate how an approval or reversal will be explained.

Access to a campaign does not remove its conditions. Retain the allowed promotion methods and identify the person authorised to clarify them. Verify any material change to the offer, destination, market or tracking setup. This keeps the network relationship tied to a specific, inspectable buying plan.

Agreement and permitted promotion

Agreement should name the allowed channel, audience, destination, conversion event, attribution scope and acceptance criteria. Keep the applicable version with the campaign brief. An ambiguous essential field needs clarification before the first purchase, especially when a later rejection could make the entire test commercially uninterpretable.

Evidence and identifiers

Evidence should connect the cost record with the accepted event at the level the actual implementation supports. Test identifiers and preserve source labels where available. Reconcile the external network, customer or payment record rather than relying solely on an early conversion proxy. State a missing dimension explicitly instead of manufacturing a finer conclusion.

Budget and pending settlement

Budget should include an affordable pilot limit and a rule for outcomes still awaiting validation or payment. Determine who can approve another commitment while cash is pending. Preserve the relevant review date and original assumption so a change in acceptance behaviour can be understood before it becomes a larger operating exposure.

Governance and changed conditions

Governance means explaining why an offer, source or creative was retained, restricted or stopped. Recheck permissions and economics when the receiving route, agreement or traffic mix changes. Keep the person responsible and the next review condition visible. That record supports continuity when another authorised buyer takes over the campaign.

ControlRequired operating rule
EligibilityConfirm that the exact offer permits the planned source type, market and destination.
MeasurementTest available identifiers and reconcile the cohort at the verified reporting scope.
Decision ruleApprove another commitment from mature acceptance evidence and an affordable cash position.
RollbackKeep the applicable earlier settings, terms and receiving version available for review.
1. DefineName the offer, allowed route and accepted action.
2. InstrumentInspect cost, identifier and validation records.
3. TestRun a bounded test under the applicable permission.
4. AllocateKeep, restrict, repair or pause with an explained reason.
Stop rule: Pause a source cell when it breaches the approved loss or quality ceiling after the expected conversion window. Do not rescue it by changing several variables at once.

References for implementation and disclosure checks

These references support implementation and disclosure checks for the relevant system or context. Use the specific source for the system or disclosure question it addresses, then confirm the applicable offer terms with the responsible provider.

Search intent and buyer decision

Keep the network choice connected with an actual buying decision

Account strategists should ask what evidence would change the next allocation. A different network, offer or promotion route can change acceptance and settlement conditions as well as delivery. Compare the relationship your campaign actually needs. Use the related learning resources when you need background, and keep the buying decision tied to the terms of this campaign.

Decision record: Identify the exact offer, approved route, accepted action, validation window and payment obligation. Keep the applicable versions beside the campaign and receiving references. The result should let another authorised reviewer understand which relationship was tested and where an unresolved permission or reporting gap limits the conclusion.

Questions for the next purchase: Do the permitted route and offer still match? Has the relevant cohort completed validation? Do approved value, reversals, fees and cost scope reconcile? Can the business afford another commitment while any payment remains pending? Resolve the material uncertainty or narrow the proposed test before increasing the expense.

CheckpointPage-specific actionEvidence to keep
Test cellDefine the exact offer and eligible promotion route.Applicable terms, receiving version and written clarification where needed.
ReconciliationCompare the same cohort across media, tracking and acceptance records.Original report dates, available identifiers and unresolved gaps.
Budget actionApprove a specific next commitment or repair the identified issue.Mature cost/value scope, pending settlement and the dated decision.

How can reversals change an apparently attractive payout?

Hypothetical example: A campaign spends USD 300 on media and records 20 actions. If 12 are approved at an invented USD 40 commission, approved value is USD 480. If two are later reversed under the assumed terms, remaining value is USD 400. An invented USD 20 fee leaves USD 380, or USD 80 above media expense before any other costs. Received cash remains a separate status. These figures illustrate the effect of acceptance, reversals and cost scope; they are not FroggyAds prices, network benchmarks or actual campaign results.

Why choose FroggyAds for the media-buying part?

Use FroggyAds when your permitted campaign needs direct self-serve control of supported formats, targeting, bids and budgets. We help you put the paid-media plan into operation while your own records and external offer terms define accepted value. Prepare the route, set an affordable commitment and review the actual evidence before buying more traffic. Create your free FroggyAds account.

Direct answer

What matters before you buy traffic for a network offer?

Demand a clear relationship before committing media: know the permitted route, accepted event, approval and reversal conditions, reporting scope and payment obligation. Choose FroggyAds for the self-serve traffic execution that fits those conditions. Keep the external commission agreement and your media expense distinguishable so the next purchase follows usable evidence.