---
title: "PopAds Review for Advertisers | FroggyAds"
canonical: "https://froggyads.com/popads-review/"
markdown_url: "https://froggyads.com/popads-review.md"
description: "Independent PopAds review covering formats, funding, pricing, strengths, limitations and a controlled advertiser test against FroggyAds."
language: "en"
---

[Home](https://froggyads.com/)/[Compare Ad Networks](https://froggyads.com/best-ad-networks/)/PopAds reviewIndependent advertiser review

# PopAds review for advertisers
facts, fit, costs and test design

This PopAds review uses current official information, separates platform features from performance claims, and gives media buyers a practical way to decide whether to keep, test or diversify their traffic sources. In the PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design workflow, this point matters because the buyer needs to compare documented differences and practical fit; Popads Vs Froggyads has a different scope.

[Create My Free Account](https://premium.froggyads.com/#/signup)[Read the verdict](https://froggyads.com/popads-review/#verdict)**Platform type**specialist popunder advertising network**Funding**official FAQ states $10 for selected methods; verify current account options**Decision metric**Accepted conversion value

![Independent PopAds advertiser review dashboard](https://froggyads.com/assets-redesign-2026/images/v39-competitor-intelligence/popads-review-hero.svg)

### What does this page explain about PopAds Review for Advertisers?

**Quick answer:** Independent PopAds review covering formats, funding, pricing, strengths, limitations and a controlled advertiser test against FroggyAds. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation. No public review can prove what PopAds will deliver for a specific advertiser. This context matters for review evidence hierarchy because popunder and related onclick inventory with detailed pop-specific targeting and API controls. For the PopAds review, separate identity verification from campaign or publisher performance evidence.

| Section | Distinct excerpt from this page |
|---|---|
| Where PopAds can be strong | The platform is positioned around specialist popunder advertising network, with popunder and related onclick inventory with detailed pop-specific targeting and API controls. |
| Where the review needs caution | The public FAQ contains legacy payment references and must be checked against the live account. |
| Formats and buying models | Its buying logic includes cost-per-visitor style bidding expressed through popunder bids and budget controls. |

Reference for PopAds Review for Advertisers: [PopAds advertiser overview Official source](https://www.popads.net/advertisers.html).

Editorial review for PopAds Review for Advertisers: [FroggyAds Editorial Team](https://froggyads.com/editorial-policy/), 2026-08-02.

Review verdict

## PopAds can be useful when the format and operating model fit

PopAds is not automatically good or bad traffic. It is a buying environment with a specific format mix, funding model, optimization workflow and publisher supply. The right question is whether those conditions match the campaign you can measure profitably.

### Where PopAds can be strong

PopAds can be a sensible choice when its public product footprint matches the campaign job. The platform is positioned around specialist popunder advertising network, with popunder and related onclick inventory with detailed pop-specific targeting and API controls.

- Specialist focus on popunder inventory

- Low stated entry threshold in the public FAQ

- Detailed API and pop-specific campaign settings

- Useful for focused pop tests rather than mixed-format buying

### Where the review needs caution

A fair review separates product access from campaign outcome. PopAds can provide useful inventory and controls, but those inputs do not repair weak conversion tracking, an uncompetitive offer or a landing page that does not fit the traffic context.

- Popunder intent is different from native, search or push traffic

- The public FAQ contains legacy payment references and must be checked against the live account

- Low bids can reduce volume or change the source mix

- A specialist network is not automatically the best choice for every landing experience

Reviewed July 12, 2026. Features, payment methods, prices, policies and account availability can change. Confirm the current terms in the official account before funding. For **Popads Review**, apply this rule to the page-specific audience, market, format or buying decision described here.

Product footprint

## What PopAds publicly offers advertisers

Make What PopAds publicly offers advertisers specific to PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design by tying it to the exact workflow, audience or commercial constraint described on this page. Preserve the source, date and owner for product, description, matters, because, format and reaches whenever they affect the decision, especially when the page compares options or sets a budget boundary. If the section exposes a measurement gap, repair that gap before changing the offer, creative and targeting simultaneously.

### Formats and buying models

PopAds currently presents popunder and related onclick inventory with detailed pop-specific targeting and API controls. Its buying logic includes cost-per-visitor style bidding expressed through popunder bids and budget controls. A buyer should verify the exact combination supported by the selected format before launch.

### Funding and budget reality

The current official PopAds FAQ states a $10 minimum deposit for PayPal and AlertPay and no minimum for wire transfers. Because the FAQ names legacy payment services, advertisers should verify live methods and thresholds inside the account before funding. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

For PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design, connect this rule to the named audience, workflow, or comparison before acting. The funding threshold only unlocks the account. A useful test budget must also cover several sources, conversion lag and enough accepted outcomes to distinguish signal from noise.

**Connect the guide to live testing**

## Connect PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and to a controlled audience test

Use the choices established in “What PopAds publicly offers advertisers” to define one audience, budget and source set in FroggyAds. Keep the surrounding offer and measurement rule stable so the test adds evidence to popads review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and instead of mixing several changes at once.

[Create My Free Account](https://premium.froggyads.com/#/signup)

![Illustration of audience targeting controls for a popads review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test](https://froggyads.com/assets-redesign-2026/images/showcase-audience-targeting.svg)

Independent evaluation

## How to read a PopAds review without being misled

A platform review becomes unreliable when it treats a low bid, a large traffic number or a single successful case study as proof that every advertiser will win. Those are access signals. The business result still depends on offer economics, creative relevance, landing-page continuity, tracking accuracy and source-level decisions. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

The practical role of How to read a PopAds review without being misled in PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design is to expose the exact condition that can change the buyer's next action. Compare Start, defining, prospecting, retargeting, app-install and direct-response under the same scope and review window; if one is unknown, keep that uncertainty explicit rather than filling the gap with an estimate. If the section exposes a measurement gap, repair that gap before changing the offer, creative and targeting simultaneously. A controlled FroggyAds test can turn this section into measurable evidence: keep the conversion definition stable, preserve source identifiers and compare marginal performance before expanding.

### Use first-party facts for product access

Official documentation is the best place to confirm formats, bidding models, payment thresholds, policy rules and account workflows. Third-party reviews can add operational perspective, but they can also be outdated, affiliate-funded or based on one country and one offer. This page therefore treats current official material as the source of record for product facts. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

### Use your own accepted outcomes for quality

Treat Use your own accepted outcomes for quality as a specific gate for PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design, not as a reusable checklist item that means the same thing on every page. Keep the review anchored to public, prove, deliver, specific, Measure and downstream; those details are the parts of this section that can materially change the recommendation. Do not scale the conclusion beyond the evidence window; repeat the check after the next meaningful change in volume, scope or audience. If the next step is a media test, FroggyAds lets the advertiser keep campaign settings and source-level performance visible instead of treating traffic volume as proof of success.

### Separate minimum funding from minimum evidence

The current official PopAds FAQ states a $10 minimum deposit for PayPal and AlertPay and no minimum for wire transfers. Because the FAQ names legacy payment services, advertisers should verify live methods and thresholds inside the account before funding. That answer is useful for onboarding, but it is not a campaign recommendation. A broad campaign can spend the minimum across too many sources and learn almost nothing. A narrow campaign can create clearer evidence with fewer variables and a deliberately bounded budget.

### Judge CPM and CPC in context

The PopAds API documents a minimum max_bid value of 0.0005 per popunder and a minimum daily budget value of 2.5, but actual delivery and effective CPM depend on GEO, quality settings, competition and targeting. Convert every pricing model into comparable business metrics. For CPM buying, calculate effective CPC, conversion rate, CPA and conversion value. For CPC buying, track impression quality and post-click acceptance so cheap clicks do not hide poor outcomes.

### Review scorecard

- Format-to-offer fit

- Funding and payment terms

- Source visibility

- Conversion tracking

- Policy compatibility

- Accepted outcome economics

![PopAds advertiser review evaluation matrix](https://froggyads.com/assets-redesign-2026/images/v39-competitor-intelligence/popads-review-matrix.svg)

Buyer fit

## When PopAds may fit and when a second network is useful

On PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design, use this control to keep the page's evidence and action traceable. Using more than one traffic source can reduce concentration risk, but only when each platform has a defined role and the measurement rules stay consistent.

### Keep or test PopAds

PopAds deserves a controlled test when you are buyers who specifically need a focused popunder test with granular pop-specific controls. Keep the scope narrow enough to identify which format, market and source group produced the result.

- Specialist focus on popunder inventory

### Add FroggyAds to the comparison

FroggyAds can be tested as a separate self-serve source when you want Push, Native, Display, Pop, Video and Interstitial formats, a $50 public minimum deposit and source-level campaign controls. These are access differences, not performance guarantees. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

- Use the same accepted conversion definition

- Match GEO, device and destination

- Set independent stop and scale rules

**Choose the execution format**

## Choose a paid-media format that supports PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and

Use the criteria around “When PopAds may fit and when a second network is useful” to decide whether push, native, display or pop fits the message and destination. Set format, targeting and spend as campaign controls in FroggyAds while the popads review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and decision remains the standard for judging the result.

[Create My Free Account](https://premium.froggyads.com/#/signup)

![Illustration comparing advertising formats for popads review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and execution](https://froggyads.com/assets-redesign-2026/images/showcase-ad-formats.svg)

Controlled test

## A practical PopAds review workflow

Treat A practical PopAds review workflow as a specific gate for PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design, not as a reusable checklist item that means the same thing on every page. Document Build, matched, instead, opinions, Preserve and baseline in the same decision record so a later reviewer can see why the option passed, failed or needs a narrower retest. If the section exposes a measurement gap, repair that gap before changing the offer, creative and targeting simultaneously. Use FroggyAds to test the media assumption that follows from this section, not to replace the evidence the section requires. Campaign controls support the decision; they do not manufacture proof.

1**Define the campaign job**Choose one objective, one format role and one accepted business event.2**Confirm current terms**Check PopAds funding, payment methods, available formats and policy rules in the live account.3**Validate tracking**Test click IDs, postbacks, deduplication and downstream status before meaningful spend.4**Launch a bounded cohort**Use one GEO and a manageable device or audience scope so source differences remain visible.5**Review mature outcomes**Wait for conversion lag, reconcile accepted events and compare source concentration.6**Scale only proven segments**Increase budget in measured steps while keeping a stable control and rollback rule.

### What a fair result looks like

A fair result is not the lowest CPC or the highest click volume. It is a campaign that reaches the declared audience, produces accepted outcomes at sustainable economics and retains enough source diversity to scale without quality collapsing. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

Record spend, impressions, clicks, effective CPM, conversions, accepted conversions, revenue or value, source concentration and conversion lag. Compare the complete chain. If PopAds produces cheaper clicks but a lower acceptance rate, the apparent advantage may disappear after reconciliation.

### What invalidates the review

Changing the offer, landing page, attribution window and traffic format at the same time makes the platform conclusion weak. So does stopping after one conversion, allowing a broken postback to run, or judging broad automation before it has enough data. Repair those issues before declaring a winner. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

![PopAds advertiser review test workflow](https://froggyads.com/assets-redesign-2026/images/v39-competitor-intelligence/popads-review-workflow.svg)

Decision workbook

## Review evidence hierarchy for PopAds

For PopAds review, turn official platform facts into a dated test plan that another media buyer can audit, reproduce and compare with the same offer, tracking and acceptance rules.

PopAds is a specialist popunder network rather than a general replacement for every channel. Its public FAQ includes legacy payment references, so live account terms should be verified separately from the platform's documented pop-specific controls and API. This context matters for review evidence hierarchy because popunder and related onclick inventory with detailed pop-specific targeting and API controls. Treat each materially different environment as its own test cell instead of presenting one account-wide average as the truth.

A useful review distinguishes verified product facts, testable operating observations and campaign outcomes. Product documentation can confirm formats, bidding models and billing rules. Only a controlled campaign can show whether those inputs fit a particular offer. For PopAds, the verified starting points are its public positioning as specialist popunder advertising network, the documented buying approaches of cost-per-visitor style bidding expressed through popunder bids and budget controls, and the current funding guidance summarized on this page. These facts define what can be tested, not what the outcome will be.

Build the research file before launch. Save the date, official source URL, relevant account screenshot, currency, payment method, campaign objective, format, country, device scope and attribution window. When a term changes later, the team can explain why the old conclusion no longer applies instead of silently mixing two product versions. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

Create a matched control. Use the same destination, accepted conversion event, value rule and reporting timezone wherever the platforms permit it. Match the user context as closely as possible. If PopAds supplies popunder and related onclick inventory with detailed pop-specific targeting and API controls, do not compare the result with an unrelated search or social campaign and call the difference a network effect. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

The strongest reasons to shortlist PopAds are specialist focus on popunder inventory; low stated entry threshold in the public faq; detailed api and pop-specific campaign settings; useful for focused pop tests rather than mixed-format buying. The important cautions are popunder intent is different from native, search or push traffic; the public faq contains legacy payment references and must be checked against the live account; low bids can reduce volume or change the source mix; a specialist network is not automatically the best choice for every landing experience. Convert each strength and caution into a testable question. For example, source controls should be judged by whether they let the buyer isolate repeatable value, not merely by whether a source ID appears in a report. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

Define evidence quality in advance. A click proves delivery, a platform conversion proves that a configured event fired, and an accepted downstream outcome proves commercial value. Reconcile those layers after normal conversion lag. Pause decisions based only on early dashboard totals when refunds, duplicate leads or later acceptance can change the economics. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

The final review verdict should be conditional. Record where the platform is a strong fit, where evidence is still missing, which campaign job should remain with the incumbent and what must be true before more budget moves. Write the decision rule before the campaign begins. Include the maximum acceptable loss, the minimum number of mature outcomes, the concentration limit for one source and the conditions that trigger a creative refresh, bid change, source exclusion or full stop. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

Use FroggyAds as a matched comparison rather than a promised winner. Its public offer includes Push, Native, Display, Pop, Video and Interstitial, a $50 minimum deposit and source-level controls. Keep the same measurement contract and let accepted outcome economics determine whether FroggyAds, PopAds, a split allocation or no scale is the correct result. In this PopAds review, verify the point against specialist popunder and onclick inventory and the current billing terms before changing an established media allocation.

### Research worksheet

- Verified formats and buying models

- Current billing and account terms

- Matched campaign objective

- Accepted conversion definition

- Source-level performance evidence

- Conditions for scale or exit

### Questions to close

- Which product claim, pricing term or platform capability in PopAds review is verified by an official source?

- Which conclusion still requires campaign evidence?

- Which variable differs from the control?

- When has the matched campaign test for PopAds review run long enough for conversion delay, rejection and accepted value to mature?

- What exact rule authorizes more spend?

**Put the guide into practice**

## Turn PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and into a bounded campaign test

With “Review evidence hierarchy for PopAds” documented, launch only the next reversible test. Set a spending limit, preserve the baseline and use source-level and audience controls so the next step depends on qualified outcomes for popads review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and, not activity volume.

[Create My Free Account](https://premium.froggyads.com/#/signup)

![Illustration of a campaign launch checklist for popads review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and](https://froggyads.com/assets-redesign-2026/images/showcase-campaign-launch-checklist.svg)

Source ledger

## Official information used for this PopAds review

The practical role of Official information used for this PopAds review in PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design is to expose the exact condition that can change the buyer's next action. Compare first-party, reviewed, July, External, links and support under the same scope and review window; if one is unknown, keep that uncertainty explicit rather than filling the gap with an estimate. If the evidence does not support the current assumption, narrow the scope or run the smallest reversible test that can resolve it.

- [PopAds advertiser overviewOfficial source](https://www.popads.net/advertisers.html)

- [PopAds official FAQOfficial source](https://www.popads.net/faq.html)

- [PopAds API v2 documentationOfficial source](https://www.popads.net/docs/api_v2.html)

- [PopAds homepageOfficial source](https://www.popads.net/)

- [FroggyAds pricingOfficial source](https://froggyads.com/pricing/)

- [FroggyAds ad formatsOfficial source](https://froggyads.com/ad-formats/)

- [FroggyAds traffic sourcesOfficial source](https://froggyads.com/traffic-sources/)

- [FroggyAds advertisersOfficial source](https://froggyads.com/advertisers/)

Questions

## PopAds review FAQ

Practical answers for advertisers evaluating platform fit, cost and test design.

### independent checkpoint: should Popads Review prove the qualified action?

independent checkpoint: Popads Review defines the qualified action. plain measurement: Popads Review caps the stated investment cap. formal check: Popads Review checks buyer fit.

### gradual decision: who owns the Popads Review campaign record?

gradual decision: Popads Review assigns the commercial reviewer. practical test: Popads Review records the campaign record. plain reconciliation: Popads Review states the buyer qualification.

### defensible handoff: should Popads Review test one measurable input?

defensible handoff: Popads Review tests one measurable input. sensible budget check: Popads Review keeps the unchanged campaign cell. practical verification: Popads Review checks measurement stability.

### selective pilot: does Popads Review cite a buyer-visible support?

selective pilot: Popads Review cites the buyer-visible support. reliable diagnosis: Popads Review states the service limit. sensible scope check: Popads Review asks the launch owner.

### calm check: should Popads Review fit the relevant audience?

calm check: Popads Review defines the relevant audience. consistent decision: Popads Review checks the decision timing. reliable comparison: Popads Review protects result consistency.

### clear readback: should Popads Review count the service fee?

clear readback: Popads Review counts the service fee. steady control: Popads Review adds the platform charge. consistent test: Popads Review caps the fixed cost ceiling. methodical reconciliation: Popads Review checks the useful result.

### separate examination: should Popads Review trust the delivery file?

separate examination: Popads Review reads the delivery file. open evaluation: Popads Review checks the platform report. steady discussion: Popads Review trusts the sale-quality event.

### cautious control: should Popads Review pause for audience leakage?

cautious control: Popads Review pauses for audience leakage. formal release check: Popads Review records the important limitation. open examination: Popads Review verifies the updated evidence.

### independent evidence check: should Popads Review improve from reviewable findings?

independent evidence check: Popads Review uses reviewable findings. plain reconciliation: Popads Review tests one measurable input. formal evidence check: Popads Review keeps the comparable baseline segment. direct discussion: Popads Review checks delivery quality.

### gradual scope check: can Popads Review take a written increase?

gradual scope check: Popads Review takes a written increase. practical validation: Popads Review checks the buyer action. plain release check: Popads Review caps the stated investment cap. measurable briefing: Popads Review protects result consistency.

Continue the research

## Related PopAds and FroggyAds resources

[PopAds competitorsCompare realistic platform options](https://froggyads.com/popads-competitors/)[PopAds minimum depositFunding and test-budget guide](https://froggyads.com/popads-minimum-deposit/)[PopAds CPM ratesRate and auction-planning guide](https://froggyads.com/popads-cpm-rates/)[PopAds alternativeEvaluate FroggyAds as an alternative](https://froggyads.com/popads-alternative/)[PopAds vs FroggyAdsOpen the paired comparison](https://froggyads.com/popads-vs-froggyads/)
Run a matched test

## Compare accepted outcomes before moving more budget

Open a FroggyAds advertiser account, validate tracking and test one matched cohort. Performance depends on the market, offer, creative, format, bid and measurement quality. For **Popads Review**, apply this rule to the page-specific audience, market, format or buying decision described here.

[Create My Free Account](https://premium.froggyads.com/#/signup)[Compare networks](https://froggyads.com/best-ad-networks/)

## Is PopAds legit? A practical verification standard

**Direct answer:** PopAds has a public website and product information, but legitimacy is not the same as suitability or profitability. Verify the exact domain, company and support channels, read current terms, confirm payment details inside the authenticated account, protect credentials, and begin with a bounded test that can be stopped without exposing more budget or inventory.

A legitimate platform can still be the wrong fit for a particular geography, format, traffic source, website or compliance requirement. Separate business verification from campaign evidence. The first asks whether the service and account path are authentic; the second asks whether the resulting traffic or monetization is acceptable for the specific use case. For the PopAds review, separate identity verification from campaign or publisher performance evidence.

Do not send credentials, recovery codes or funds through links received from unverified messages. Use the official domain, enable available security controls, confirm invoice and payment details, and keep a record of support conversations. Treat unexpected payment-route changes or requests to bypass the normal dashboard as a stop signal. For the PopAds review, separate identity verification from campaign or publisher performance evidence.

For advertisers, cap initial spend and reconcile accepted conversions after the lag window. For publishers, test one placement, monitor user complaints and invalid activity, and confirm that reported earnings become payable under the current terms. No review can guarantee approval, revenue, conversions or dispute outcomes. For the PopAds review, separate identity verification from campaign or publisher performance evidence.

| Verification layer | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Identity | Official domain, legal pages and authenticated account path |
| Money | Current payment method, threshold, fees and invoice record |
| Operations | Support response, reporting, controls and safe exit |
| Outcome | Mature accepted value after adjustments |

### Official verification sources

- [PopAds FAQ](https://www.popads.net/faq.html)

- [PopAds terms of service](https://www.popads.net/terms-of-service.html)

- [PopAds advertisers](https://www.popads.net/advertisers.html)

Search intent and buyer decision

## How to use this PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design page

This URL has one primary job for **performance-focused advertisers**: **compare documented differences and practical fit**. Keep this page focused on that buying decision instead of turning it into a generic advertising article. 

Entity coverage for PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design is complete only when the operating context is explicit: check source quality against downstream acceptance rather than click volume alone. Use those checks to compare documented differences and practical fit, not as standalone claims.

| Step | Comparison workflow | Evidence to retain |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | List documented differences without inventing a winner | Keep the evidence tied to PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design and the accepted outcome defined for this URL. |
| 2 | Match each difference to the buyer's actual operating requirement | Keep the evidence tied to PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design and the accepted outcome defined for this URL. |
| 3 | Validate the shortlist with the same bounded test and outcome definition | Keep the evidence tied to PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design and the accepted outcome defined for this URL. |

### Transparent PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design decision example

**Hypothetical decision example:** suppose the buyer requires source transparency, targeting control and conversion measurement. Record documentary evidence for each requirement, reject options that miss a mandatory condition, then test the remaining option under the same outcome definition. This is a decision method, not a provider ranking. 

Use FroggyAds as the execution layer only when the page's decision calls for paid traffic. Set the relevant budget, targeting and format controls, verify conversion tracking, keep source-level evidence, and increase spend only when the accepted outcome supports the next step. [Create your free FroggyAds account](https://premium.froggyads.com/#/signup). 

Direct answer

## PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design — what matters first

PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design is a comparison decision: verify documented differences, match them to your campaign needs, and test the option that fits rather than assuming a universal winner. For PopAds review for advertisers facts, fit, costs and test design, this check supports the decision to compare documented differences and practical fit; do not substitute the scope of Popads Vs Froggyads.