Even if ByteDance wanted to resist Chinese Communist Party control, it’d have little real prospect of doing so. China’s National Intelligence Law, passed in 2017, allows the executive to compel any Chinese company to supply essentially any advice it requests, including data on foreign citizens. Furthermore, Chinese laws can also force these requests to be kept secret and never disclosed via transparency reviews. The loss of an impartial judiciary system makes it almost unattainable for a company to appeal a request from the Chinese government. On top of that, Chinese agencies of any real size are legally required to have Communist Party “cells” inside them to guarantee adherence to the party line.
However, there is little evidence ByteDance wants to withstand the Chinese government. In fact, there are a large number of examples that it is complicit in the Chinese Communist Party’s authoritarian guidelines. In 2018, ByteDance shut down Neihan Duanzi, a Chinese social media platform that was primarily used to share jokes and comedy, after state censors accused it of internet hosting “vulgar” content. Afterward, ByteDance said that it might “deepen cooperation” with the Chinese communist party. It then hired 2,000 more “content reviewers” and stated that “strong political sensitivity” can be an asset for the place. Bueno, no olvidemos ese dicho que reza: “Cuando algo en internet es gratis, el producto eres tú”.
No nos impresione que suceda en China, en EE. UU. o Rusia. Da igual. Todo tiene un costo y, en information superhighway, si es gratis, de alguna manera deben sacar partido quiénes brindan ciertos servicios. En lo non-public, me parece un buen articulo.
Creo que todos somos o deberíamos ser conscientes de los riesgos, pero, sucede que nada cambiará, pues, las redes sociales, sean chinas, rusas, estadounidenses o, de donde sean, siempre son una tentación para las personas. Por ejemplo: No necesariamente tenemos que tener una cuenta en Facebook o en Tik Tok para ser rastreados en internet. ¿Metadatos?Por supuesto. ¿Puertas traseras?Siempre. Felicidades!Es un gran articulo.
I have never been a tiktok user childrens social media but, is terribly scary that the most called tutanota private email carrier tell of how insecure tiktok is good when DT begin to say that China is spying us with tiktok, that tiktok is unhealthy to the US countrywide security and bla bla bla. If just decide that you just want to write a blog about the insecurity in tiktok i have some apparent question:1. Why do you talk especially about tiktot?this nasty practices are common in social media, why did you discuss how insecure are your data in any social media in normal?2. Why now and with out talking about the US president declarations about tiktot?I don’t think you are looking to appear to be if you were assisting some political party, but doing this right now makes you seem like the scoop in countrys that have dictators and they say “there can be more taxes this year” and also you examine the scoop and also you see articles like “how the social inequality domines countrys with few taxes rate”. 3. Why so many emphasis in the incontrovertible fact that is China the country that’s getting our data?No, im not from CCP, but if you are looking to write articles like a chunk of journalism, you are supposed to be impartial.
I have read some articles here in protonmail. com, and i don’t think that you just only discuss “how bad is China”, i see that you just even have articles about Google and other partys, but i still note a little bit of “why the US president is good and they should sell Tiktok to US” in this article. Hi Daniel, thanks for the questions. We write about many privacy invasive technologies, from smart TVs to Facebook to Amazon Ring. We are acutely aware of the politicization of TikTok, but we now have purposely prevented bringing up these issues and concentrated solely on privacy and safety issues, that is our area of advantage and is apolitical. You also ask about why we focus on China’s surveillance and privacy abuses without citing those of the US and other Western nations.
However, if you look through our past blog articles, including in the last few months, we now have written greatly about laws and practices in the US, UK, and in other places that are damaging to human rights. In fact, mass surveillance in the US is what led us to create ProtonMail in the first place.