DataTo know when a book was copied, one needs to determine where in the timespan of a script the sample in question can be placed. Does a method of writing fit better in the early stages of a script, is it representative of the end of its life cycle, or most likely rather someplace in the middle age?To be capable of answer this query one must know how the font in question constructed over time. This is the sort of research I have been doing over the last few years, called quantitative paleography because it uses a high volume of verifiable data. Thus it is feasible to map how Pregothic developed by tracking,for instance, the letter pair de Fig. 3, magnifying glass.
Here the two elements of this letter pair, which was written down in 1156 or 1157, are touching one an alternate, albeit only a bit. Just 20 years in advance these same letters would still have been written fully separated. This turns into clear after we gather data from manuscripts that bear a date like the one in Fig. 3, which they do every now after which. When this data is amassed you possibly can deduce, with statistical help, when bound features were born or once they died.
Thus data shows, for instance, that the touching of de is first encountered in the period 1150 1175. The manner, which I dubbed “kissing” during this free downloadable book which also shows how the strategy works, maintains until the two letters fully overlap. This is named “biting” by script specialists Fig. 4, magnifying glass. Secret – notThe common medieval scribe knew a few scripts by heart.
Commercial producers of books, mentioned at the outset of this post, aimed to thrill a various clientele and could therefore likely have known more fonts than any other type of scribe, adding the monk Fig. 6. The latter was very conservative: he didn’t often have a broad palette of scripts and he was disinclined to conform his manner of writing on command. Still, even within single scripts monks show edition in the sort of execution. Interestingly, he poured into anything from his cultural old background in the form of letters, revealing to the attentive beholder when precisely he wrote a book, even when he did not give this piece of information away explicitly. Reblogged this on Perceval Archeostoria english site and commented:One of the basic things in a medieval book is letters – those symbols that replenish page after page and that make up which means.
Each one of us humans writes in another way and considering the fact that that medieval books were made before the invention of print, it follows that the scripts they convey show a good variety in execution styles. This is perhaps the most dazzling adventure of spending a day dealing with a pile of medieval books in the library: the large model in the way during which the text is written on the parchment pages. Please read this alluring articole by ERIK KWAKKEL. Great post and interesting blog. A post from Feb. ’15 mentions the Voynich Mss.
— while your point “As intriguing as the book is, from a book historical standpoint it is far less appealing than Tironian notes. After all, while the Voynich manuscript appears to be coded in a highly personal way, putting the book in a comparatively isolated place…” is easily taken, your views on the paleography of the script and what that can say in regards to the dating and origin of the script probable break free the dating of the vellum it’s written on would be of attention.