Both domain redirect and pa promoting offer large volumes of traffic. It is glaring, though, that pop’s volumes are much bigger, with more than 43 billion accessible redirects monthly on pop vs. almost 1,5 billion on domain redirect as envisioned with Traffic Calculator. This, again, is because of the site visitors’s nature. Zero click traffic offers a smaller, yet better targeted viewers, while pop traffic offers a significantly larger variety of competencies users, regardless of its focused on being much more standard.
Hence, bigger volumes of users wish to see your pop ads so as to convert, than with well targetable domain redirect crusade. While good quality landers for both domain redirect campaign and dad promoting crusade want to come with crisp copy, easy navigation, enticing visuals in addition to clear and applicable CTA – adding on relevant links is usually attributed to zero click promoting. In turn, a better center around visuals and CTA is placed with pop ads. Of course, shady practices of tricking users into clicking the wrong buttons or disruptive visuals are a typical trait of pop up promoting, particularly the intrusive ones. Yet, the resolution no matter if to use such ideas or not is left wholly up to you and the type of affiliate crusade you’re operating.
Firstly, $100 will absolutely buy you way more traffic with pop advertising than with zero click, which could be very useful for operating tests if that’s your objective. Secondly, pop’s average bid price is significantly less than zero click site visitors bid price. This is because pop ads require much bigger volumes of site visitors to get actual views than domain redirect, that may be attributable to browsers’ default or manual blocking of pop ads, which isn’t the case with domain redirect. Be aware also, mobile pop site visitors has become quite a crowded place for displaying ads currently since here’s where all the individuals are at, thus inflating the bid price.