If you’re in the enterprise of answering unknown unknowns, you have job safeguard for another five years or so. This is barely as a result of analytics proprietors are still not taking the ML revolution seriously. Not at Adobe, not at Google, not at SAP, not at IBM. There are small efforts.
Click on link called Assistant in the left nav of the Google Analytics app, or click the link in Analytics that says Data Driven Attribution. They in the event you hints, even as they leave the action totally on the human. I think we need our edition of the Manhattan task. Hopefully analytics owners will pivot in a big way – why solve the urgent, surely going to go away in two years, issues of today?First, and perhaps most associated with your post, is that work/career needs to be divorced continually from money/compensation. Amitabh dreamt of a star trek desktop, but what’s needed more than it truly is the star trek society in which that desktop exists.
College aged highly intellectual CS geeks like LandS figured naively, as twenty somethings do who lack adulthood and extensive life journey that making all info/data accessible to everybody in every single place can be for the good thing about humanity missed or disregarded the facts of human nature some of which include strong inclinations – to put it mildly – toward tribalism and superstition, short sightedness, and unwarranted conceitedness and egoism and essential historic context. Information doesn’t equal wisdom. In comical irony, I must type this as fast as I can as I’m really meant to be serving my service provider and consumers presently, not discussing essential issues facing humanity. All economies are inventions, they do not exist in nature, and as is correct of many stuff during this world, things created to serve often end up enslaving. Lastly, as I sit and write this from Costa Rica where I were operating these past couple many years, my concern is concerning the human cost of the transition to our future augmented careers and industries.
If it is anxiety producing for Avinash in Silicon Valley to be concerned about job protection, what does this appear to be for “arising / emerging” regions?Does every country try to win a spot in the “data economic climate” by sending their kids to be told coding and statistics or are there parallel paths to the longer term. I don’t know…. There is a talk this coming week here about AI, the singularity, etc. with an individual from Google and IBM Watson. What should we here be asking them?Are we just a future market for brand new tech or can we have a role to play?On your last point, it is a bit off topic and I’m not knowledgeable. My humble view is that unlike any other points of inflection during human history business revolution for ex where change meant the displaced had anything else they may do perhaps at a lower income, this time work is just disappearing – there will be nothing new to do for a vast number of humans.
It will in fact hurt the coming up and underdeveloped nations the most. To say it is heartbreaking is a massive understatement. It could be very, very, disruptive, and perhaps can only be solved if governments action their plans to tackle this now. If you look at the wealth created in Silicon Valley, it is obvious, it is a possible new elitism. If you couple this with the “inventive industries” that tend to be inefficient and human, philosophically based and at times whimsical, it looks like these industries are thoroughly losing all of their value.
This article puts it quite bluntly: . Another point here, is when AI powers and defines our context, what is lost?Tristen Harris is a very good speaker in this point. His latest article is a quick and good read: . For me paradox about AI and at last singularity is the vital mass which singularity needs should mathematically result in to machines looking after majority of “white collar” Jobs which you mentioned and which also are currently the engine that keeps economies operating. Especially when you take in to account the job that AI will create could be far lesser than the job it replaces… One data scientist swapped for 1000 crusade managers?. On the better level I’m scared as hell and on desperate to see what is out there and possible at a similar time.
But it doesn’t bother me as I decided some years ago that for me the definition of being rich or having a rich live is to were in a position to event all feelings obtainable before I leave this planet. This means the highs and the lows as with out lows there are no peaks. Come on, no AI will ever beat sitting at the beach on a sunny day being attentive to the seagulls and youngsters chatter while feeling the sand among your toes and a could drink in your hand. I try to enjoy them as much as the highbrow part, they’re similarly important. In your article you write ‘Or… Love. And, there needs to be a Move 37 for politics.
’ Funny thing is that both are large for the the latest state of AI and it’s limits I think. This as a result of The Counterfactual Regret Minimization technique uses the Nash equilibrium where the Nash equilibrium is the main mathematical strategy to fixing issues in world trade and politics and has been proven to work. To put it simplistically this formula calculates the most advantageous distribution of benefits where everybody get’s his fair proportion and most of the people are happy as the top-quality end result or the Nash equilibrium. This leads me to finish that machines will soon be able to make better choices for us when it involves questions of world trade and politics in order that is not even SF but a matter building and coaching the OS?I hope it’ll use a mockup world for this for our comfort btw. For anything it’s not much different from Go I guess. In the poker game Counterfactual Regret Minimization looks for the other side of the advantage being regret and extrapolates benefit from it.
I was surprised to see that any other part is linear programming that most of us should know if having the good thing about an educational degree. But my perception here is that the way forward for mankind might just be absolutely based on the Nash equilibrium as it is at the core of financial questioning and leading edge AI at a similar time. Funny thing is that Nash said that he was happy that love was still the gigantic mystery in live that cannot be solved or understood with math. At least in the movie A fascinating mind he said this:D The answer of would I take a trip to the beach in fully rising VR lays in what the outcome can be of this distribution of benefits and humankind’s skill to be capable of respect and minimize the regret we create for others dealt a lesser hand at the table of life. The next hundred years or so will become determining for this I guess. This because when AI will start to do our jobs for us we will soon come to a degree where humans only are looking to chill out and revel in and the machines can be there to serve us.
Or that might be feasible if the the financial thinking would change to become wiser as a result of at latest the paradigm still seems: the winner takes it all and then in fact no one wants to lose. Maybe this could be We all win for the tech vision of the long run to become reality. It will take a global of hurt to get there of course as this also is what has driven past and existing wars. So I think development like this will have most uncertain results and will brings along a lot of risks as the financial value of a human live will become more close to zero. Would I take the VR trip?I guess so because it’s the least terrible effect I can image so I guess I would be pleased about that and relax and try to enjoy it a bit?Will it ever happen. Mwa.
Not every time soon if you ask me. Neil: Another reader just expressed this idea, great minds think alike. :Fan Hui’s rating has indeed done very well since he began to play in opposition t AlphaGo the ranking increase in opposition t other Go grandmasters. I do not assume this being a long time trend as AI will grow, for the loss of a far better word, smarter way, way faster than us. If it is effective that you can think about it this form: Near term, humans get better as AI pushes our features.
Med term, AI complements human compute capabilities gaps as a result of AI is an awful lot smarter than us at those things. Long term, AI approaches or exceeds super intelligence. Avinash. In Drake’s equation, the reply to “how many technologically advanced civilisations exist in the Universe” varies drastically with only one variable – how long “can” a technologically complex civilisation exist with out destroying itself?If the answer is 200 years, or thereabouts we know only about ourselves and if we wreck ourselves the next day, then, at any given cut-off date the universe would have only 1 such civilisation. However, if the answer is 5000 years, the universe is teeming with such civilisations. A result of here is that if we do stumble upon an alien civilisation, they’d have, almost by definition, learnt to continue to exist and would be, dare I say, “morally awesome”.
If not, they might have destroyed themselves. As for purpose of life, do we need anyone to let us know what we already know in our hearts?Be still. Listen. It’s there. I can read it in unwritten CAPS across your comments about your infants.
It is the only thing that has kept humankind going technology by era by era by technology. The amazingly powerful force that multiplies when it is given freely and peters out absolutely when it is hoarded. The superhighway to the endless. And the most grounding, comforting journey any of us have. Hold a persons hand, you are feeling it. Look at the stars, you feel it.
Our ancestors saved it for us, passed it on. And without even a moment’s cognition, we all know our greatest success could be to do the same. Continue the species, nurture it — so that life may thrive and wither and thrive and wither in this glorious undying mortality. Someone might call this sustainability. I call it love.
And for me, the knowing … and the intention … and the thriller … is finished.